« Executed Prisoners Leave Bang KwangIllegal Ivory Trade in Thailand »
*****
My deepest sympathy to our two Thai bandits.Unfortunately it's the rule of law.The law has clearly stated this section of offence.
It might sound inhumane with this lethal painless extermination but it's better than seeing a hangman or being sent to the guillotine.A set of execution rules that dates back to history.
25/08/2009 @ 00:02
Comment from: Bill Email
This is a good example to be set for the rest of the world. Now all they need to do is to start speeding up the process and place the event on the evening news.

Great job.... Justice is served

25/08/2009 @ 02:07
Comment from: Anthony · http://www.amnesty.org
*****
I'd also like to express my sympathy for these two people whose lives are being taken.
25/08/2009 @ 08:42
Comment from: John
*****
Bill, can you be so sure in every case that these guys weren't innocent? There are many cases where people were in the wrong place at the wrong time or were set up by others. Anyway, I really don't like the death penalty for crimes which are either minor in some countries or were legal during some periods of time. How will future people look at us? Do we really have the right to terminate the life of other people? Surely only God can choose the time and place of someone's death.
25/08/2009 @ 09:49
Comment from: Bill
*****
John:

Dont get me wrong, I am not advocating that they be killed the day after the conviction in most cases... but there are times when there is no reason to waste time and money on an appeal.

These guys were caught red handed so no sympathy.

There will always be some chance that some person will be innocent somewhere, but in civilized counties those chances are minimized by the established systems. As for as I am concerned there is no need to worry about how future generations will see our actions nor try and guess what "God" will or wont do... If God was concerned then there would not have been any issue in the first place.
Face it there are people that do bad things in this world and some of those things deserve the ultimate penalty and when that is the case it should be quick and public... then at least there may be a deterrent.... taking decades to carry out the sentence serves no one
25/08/2009 @ 10:55
Comment from: Richard Barrow Email · http://www.richardbarrow.com
I don't think the death penalty is a deterrent. In the book, The Last Executioner, the guy said that he was surprised that a member of his team was dealing in drugs. Of all people he should have seen the consequences of his actions. But he still did it. He was caught and later executed.
25/08/2009 @ 12:17
Comment from: Martin Widmer
*****
No government should be allowed to kill it's own people. The law offers enough other options, which mostly leave a door open for falsely accused to be compensated in case their innocence should be revealed. Death penalty does not. I wish it would stop all over the world.
25/08/2009 @ 13:06
Comment from: Steve Suphan
Another very sad thing about this story is that those who were executed were no more than a couple of example-setters used by the new Aphisit (democratic) goverment to show the nation how tough a stance they are taking on their new anti-drug war. They ought to be totally ashamed to use 2 prisoners on death row (amongst how many!) as political pawns.
Thaksin did the same once, when one day he called in all the media and reporters, to report on 4 who were on the way to be executed. It was like a reality show (and it really was). The media were allowed to follow their every moment, braodcast it on TV and everything. The only bit they couldn't film live was the actual execution. As sick as the story above, the family of the four only found about what happened on the evening Channel 7 news.
Political publicity policy like this, is for me, more sick than pushing a few thousands Meth pills.
25/08/2009 @ 20:06
Comment from: Leosia · http://leosia.com
****-
Would have much preferred to see Abhisit given the lethal injection. He's committed more crimes than these two guys.
26/08/2009 @ 22:08
Comment from: Bill
*****
Richard:

Sadly I musy agree that currently the death penalty is not a deterrant, the problem is the time from comviction to execution. By the time the criminal is put down nobody remembers what they did to deserve the punishment.

I understand that there needs to be a reasonable time for a review of the evidence as part of a double check to make sure there were no errors (or be as sure as is possible) but to wait for years, or decades is a crime in and of itself.

A review of the evidence by should only take weeks or even days depending on the specifics and if all is correct then the execution should take place as soon as is practical and be public.

Then there would be some level of deterrant, it wont stop everyone but it might stop some and there is value in that.

Bill
26/08/2009 @ 23:01
Comment from: Jack
*****
Bill, you say: "in civilized counties those chances are minimized by the established systems". Well, don't forget Sacco and Vanzetti, they were innocent and the US Government killed them.
28/08/2009 @ 23:06
Comment from: Bill
Jack:

That was 1927 get real!!! Not everyone deserves to live, some people deserve to die for crimes committed against civilized society.
30/08/2009 @ 03:12
Comment from: ej angeles
no to death penaLTY, YES to rehabilitation.
03/09/2009 @ 11:23

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
PoorExcellent
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
« Executed Prisoners Leave Bang KwangIllegal Ivory Trade in Thailand »