The Great 'Loy Krathong' Myth!
By Stephen Cleary
Tuesday 27th November, 2007 | 699 words | Category: Stories from the Thai Press | 20 feedbacks »

(A girl dressed as the founder of Loy Krathong, the legendary Nang Noppamas. A legend she really is. Noppamas was in fact, the leading character in a nineteenth century novel)
Beyond a doubt, Loy Krathong is Thailand’s most beautiful festival. Thais and foreigners alike are taught that Loy Krathong originated something like 700 years ago in the northern province of Sukhothai. We are also meant to believe that the person who discovered this tradition was a King’s consort named Nang Noppamas; that she was the first person to make a kratong and float it.
Unfortunately however, there is no evidence whatsoever that Loy Krathong dates back to the era of King Ramkhamhaeng and Sukhothai. That is because it really is all legend, one supposedly completely made up at the end of the nineteenth century by the Department of Fine Arts.
What proof there is however and there is a lot of it, is that the Loy Kratong festival originated from the Loy Khom festival. According to the evidence available, Loy Khom (Float the lantern) surfaced in the mid eighteenth century during the Ayutthaya era and was probably based on a very similar festival which had already begun in Nakhorn Thom in Cambodia. The first person to seriously write about the Loy Khom festival was in fact a foreigner named ‘Lu Lubber’ or something like that (unsure of the transliteration from Thai to English). In contrast to the legend taught, he wrote that the Loy Khom festival was held mid-way through Buddhist Lent and not on the 12th Full month (unlike Loy Krathong in its present form). And unlike the Loy Krathong festival of now, Loy Khom was celebrated for several days to several weeks. What is the same though, is that the Loy Khom festival was a thanksgiving to the Goddess of Water and possibly the Buddha.
A water khom certainly looked different to a present day krathong. They came in various sizes from very small to huge and in them were only lanterns, there were no candles or incense sticks – those were recent innovations!
Now, one of the nicest Loy Krathong festivities is the Nang Noppamas beauty contest which is to pay homage to the one and only Mrs Noppamas, the founder of Loy Krathong, a king’s consort. Again, there is absolutely no historical evidence that Noppamas even existed, and she didn’t. Mrs Noppamas was instead the leading character of a novel released during the nearing of the reign of King Rama III – around 1850. Her character was written as guidance for all women who wished to become civil servants. Prince Damrong Rajanubhap, Thailand’s most influential historian, petitioned the government several times during his exile in Penang to revert Loy Krathong back to its original Loy Khom format and to also educate the people about the truth of Noppamas. His advice was simply ignored.
Several Thai language books concerning the truth history of Loy Krathong have been released over the past few decades, but the Ministry of Education have disallowed them in their Thai history classes. Recently, a few academics have attempted again to encourage the truth to be taught and have continually asked the Ministry of Culture to promote the real facts. They have adamantly asked that Thai school history books be re-written and explain that Noppamas really was just a legend. The Ministry of Culture have failed to even listen to their claims and turned a blind eye. But, as one academic put it, if the truth was taught, then Thailand as a country would….. ‘lose face’.
Steve's views: I never did believe the legend about Sukhothai and Noppamas anyway and so i'm not too sure whether these academics should make such a big rant about the truths to be taught. What i found ironic, was also all the fuss Prince Damrong made, as it was he himself who invented the story of King Naresuan's great battle taking place at Don Chedi in Suphanburi. He also wrote and published a lot of other rubbish. All in all though, it does however prove yet again, how much of the Thai history taught at schools is just clearly made-up.
Source: The Thai language Manager newspaper.
Do you have any questions about Thailand? Maybe you are planning a holiday or just want to learn more about Thai culture. Have all of your questions answered for free at ThailandQA.com. These forums are part of the family friendly Paknam Web Network.
| « Just Legalize Gambling... | The Thai Youth & Online Chat » |
20 comments
What!? You mean that entire reenactment I witnessed in Suphanburi was based on a lie?! I'm scandalized!
Indeed, there was a letter to the editor at The Nation the other day from regular correspondent Sunida about this very topic. She said that most Thais know that the story around Loy Krathong is made up, and that the TAT (on advice from those irksome FOREIGNERS) was largely responsible for disseminating the idea that it is some sort of Buddhist ritual with historical import. Like most Thai festivals, she wrote, it is in reality an occasion to celebrate the end of a long season of work, and enjoy.
Thanks for an interesting glimpse into Thai culture. Good Nation piece this week btw on gambling. Sure it will make an appearance here shortly.
Cheers,
Noel
Sure, last Saturday's article about gambling will be up soon. I posted this first though, as it is more time relevant.
As for Thai history being based on nationalistic propaganda, we all know about that one.
Spot on, Steve!
Keep 'em coming.
I always wonder why we would thanking the Goddess of Water by polluting her rivers with kratongs. Actually, Brandon raised the same question when we tried to float our kratongs--made of paper plates and construction paper, as always--in the marina the other night. (What does it mean if your kratongs actually came back to shore, by the way? LOL.) Floating the lanterns up into the air make a heck of a lot more sense.
Possibly this festival- or something similar- arrived in Cambodia during the Dvarati period-a heavily Indianised culture that pre-dated the Khmers. There maybe the possibility something similar took place at Sukhotthai and later died out,as modern Cambodian and Thai cultures have many simularities, even today-but no irrefutable proof of, course, as anything written on less than stone has rotted away long ago.
Smart money-spinning move on behalf of the Thai Ministry of Culture,though!
btw, if you think khom loys are more environmentally friendly, you should see the burnt out "carcases" all over Chiang Mai :-) krathongs are made of banana leaves and stalk, no styrofoam, not that much pollution overall I think.
With regards to the environmental gratong issue, our local waterways were flooded with candlelit buns of yellow, blue and pink coloured bread!
I'm certain that both the Ministries of Education and Culture aren't always too pleased about me 'spilling the beans' a lot, but i think it's only fair that this kinda stuff gets written into English from time to time. Anyway, just cause a lot of us are closer to the real truth of Loy Krathong now, doesn't make us less appreciative of this lovely tradition.
has roots in India, with Divali. Check
a few references, like Wikipedia...LOL
You are quite correct about Thailand's cultural minions not wanting to face
reality. Just look at Thai
'Traditional' clothing. Topless was the fashion until WWII and still occurs in
some rural areas....
There are still some areas in Thailand where the women go topless? Do you mean the go-go bars? As i hope you don't mean in the Thai countryside
Thai countryside with topless women. I
need to get that information onto
Wikipedia. Thanks in advance.
I also notice a lot of avoidance to linking anything of their culture to their pre sukhothai ancestors.
I don't see why the thai government does not correct their mistakes. Don't you think it makes them look better if they admitted their faults. It can probably help make their neighbors appreciate them more.
In terms of the Thais not rushing to adopt the to-the-letter history, they are hardly by themselves.
George Washington did NOT cut own any cherry tree, and Abraham Lincoln did NOT grow up in a log cabin. The actual US history books, currently used in classrooms, are quite full of holes.
The Pope recently made a speech condemning "seductive science", continuing a mellinia-long tradition of denying truth and reason for political gain.
Caesar Augustus made a concerted effort to create a 'Roman" identity that simply did not exist before him. One of the primary reasons Julius Caesar was assassinated was because he gave the vote to the Northern Italians, who were QUITE different from the Southern Italians at the time...
So, the fact that the Davarati period was actually a Hmong kingdom, that Nakhon Si Thammarat was a Malay city staty up until a few hundred years ago - They actually attacked Sri Lanka, and almonst won, except they fell victim to a switch of allegience on the battlefield, I believe by the Tamils, but I could be wrong) That (major) loss weakened them and postitioned them for a vassal relationship to Sukhothai. The famous Wat on the back of the 25 satang coin was not actually built by Thais. They are 100% Thai now, though. And thats what really matters.
Most of the building in Iseal attributed to King David was actually due to the influx of funds from Nebuchanezzar (guarding against the Egyptians).
Christmas would be hardly recognizable to those from a mere century ago.
Its not shameful to have historical records change. Its par for the course. Hopwever, history is an extremely useul political tool, so history is always going to be subject to those who write the books. (Heres to the internet+the free flow of information!!)
Leave a comment
| « Just Legalize Gambling... | The Thai Youth & Online Chat » |









