« National Thai Elephant DayGong Si Fa Cai »
Comment from: Stephen Cleary Email
Ive never seen those 'making-merit' financial statistics before . Interesting to note that the poor of the north-east are much more inclined to give donations to the temple than the much well-offer Bangkokian.

With a basic calculator at hand here with 'population v income received'it is easy to recognise. Mmmmmm.
2005-02-23 @ 23:30
Comment from: Nui T.
Very interesting post, and great to know the figures. These merit-making figures I speculate come from bank account information of temples. The amount raised would be directly related to how closely tied the people are to their temple of choice (a traditional community institution). The temples' monks are usually relatives and family members. These temples are where your son would be ordained by the time he is 21 and where your family members would be cremated.

In the city, that kind of community life has been severed. Migrant workers (who mostly come from the northeast) from the provinces most often return to make merit in their hometown. It is a way to show their prestige.

As for the young, as long as their parents go to the temple, when they grow older they'll more of less follow their parent's example. I certainly did not enjoy being dragged by my mom to go to the temple when I was a teenager. However, I now remember all those toture sessions with gratitude and try to drag my own teenage son with me once a while.
2005-02-24 @ 02:01
Comment from: Sripan
Yes, info. from Khun NuI T.
is right. My observation is that local tempples esp. in North-eastern provinces often get large sum of donation made by BKK people and companies e.g. through Katin and Pha Pa as they like to travel and do donate to those temples than the ones in BKK.
2005-02-24 @ 07:12
Comment from: SiamJai Email
I've been to the ceremony in Chiang Mai, and to me it seemed there was a small crowd there, eager to make their donations at six in the morning. However, I've only seen what's happening at one temple, so I can't really compare it to large-scale observations like the above.

I'm not surprised about rural folks giving more to temples than city folks. Besides the above reasons, I think that the Western influence, which emphasizes secular views, is more prevalent in cities, decreasing the extent to which city laypeople believe in the religious institution.

It also could be that because city folks have greater access to news, they are more exposed to high-profile cases of mishandling of funds by a few miscerant monks, therefore increasing their scepticism towards the system.
2005-02-25 @ 10:48

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
« National Thai Elephant DayGong Si Fa Cai »